Memorials in America:
Use the link below to watch a video about the 9/11 memorial museum.
Then, choose two more additional memorials from the list below and read the web pages that follow.
Vietnam Memorial: http://thewall-usa.com/information.asp
Pearl Harbor Memorial: http://www.nps.gov/valr/historyculture/index.htm
World War II Memorial: http://www.wwiimemorial.com/default.asp?page=facts.asp&subpage=intro
Korean War Memorial: http://www.koreanwarvetsmemorial.org/memorial
Gettsyburg Memorial: http://www.nps.gov/gett/historyculture/index.htm
Lincoln Memorial: http://www.nps.gov/linc/historyculture/stories.htm (Make sure to click the "read more" links on the page)
Gateway Arch: http://www.gatewayarch.com/experience/arch-facts-faq/
After you have done so, answer the following questions in an organized, detailed post:
1. What memorials did you read about? Who built/designed them and when?
2. Think about the reasoning behind the construction of all three memorials that you learned about. Do you think the memorials should have been built? Why? If they should not have been built, are there other ways the event could have been remembered? What are they?
3. There is no World War I memorial in Washington, D.C. After reading about the other memorials, do you think there should be one? Explain.
4. Does the recent tragedy in Boston deserve a memorial? If so, when should it be built? 5 years from now? 10? 50? Do you have any ideas about what it should look like? Explain.
5. Finally, respond to another student’s post in an organized, detailed reply.
1. The memorials that I chose to read about are the 9/11 Memorial, the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and the Korean War Memorial. My favorite memorial was the 9/11 Memorial because 9/11 was a day that no american will ever forget and it impacted so many families. The construction began in 2006 but it was recently finished and opened September 11, 2011. The 9/11 Memorial was constructed by architect Michael Arad and structural engineer groups WPS Cantor Seinuk and Burro Happold. Another beautiful memorial that I read about was the Pearl Harbor Memorial which was made in the remembrance of the 1,117 crewman who lost their lives after Japan had hit Pearl Harbor. Architect Alfred Preis constructed the Pearl Harbor Memorial which was open and dedicated in 1962. Lastly, I read about the Korean War Memorial. The Korean War was one of the toughest and devastating wars, 54,246 Americans died while 8,200 remain missing and 103,284 were injured. The memorial represents the 5.8 million soldiers who served in the war and it was opened July 27, 1995.
ReplyDelete2. After reading about all three memorials I strongly believe that all of them should have been built. The 9/11 Memorial should have been built because 9/11 will always be a tragedy that no one will forget. It was a day where thousands of innocent people died from a terrorist attack. Many families suffered from this and still suffer with the loss of their family member(s) today. The Memorial recognizes that terrible day that should always be remembered and the people who lost their lives. The other Memorial that I believe should have been built is the Korean War Memorial. Before reading the article, I had already visited the memorial last year in Washington, D.C. I did not know much about the Korean War or why the memorial was built but I can sure say that the memorial was powerful and beautiful. It definitely should have been built because it is a forgotten war that many do not give it as much attention as they do to other wars. Also, my Grampy fought in the Korean War so the memorial makes me feel closer to him. Lastly, I think that the Pearl Harbor Memorial should have been built because it happened a long time ago but was such a deadly and tragic event that we do not want it to be forgotten ever. Not many schools teach about Pearl Harbor and this generation was not here to experience it so I think that the memorial gives us a chance to look back on the event and learn about it. All three of these memorials represent such important events that should never be forgotten because they are now history.
3. Now that I have seen and learned about the other memorials and noticed that there is no World War 1 Memorial, I believe that it is reasonable that there is not one. World War 1 did not involve the U.S. as much as World War 2 did, it was mostly within Europe and surrounding countries over there. In World War 2 many more Americans died and served in that war who should be remembered. They gave up their lives fighting for our country. I think that Americans can connect better with World War 2 because it involved people that could have been their relatives or someone close to them.
4. The Boston Marathon tragedy definitely deserves a memorial. It was a terrorist attack and I believe that all terrorist attacks should be remembered through a memorial because many terrorist attacks involve deaths of innocent people. The Boston Marathon was a tragic event that everyone in Massachusetts can connect to because it happened right here in our capitol. I think it should be built as soon as possible, perhaps in a few years. My ideas for the look of the memorial are a runner with a shirt that says “Boston Strong” on it and then a platform that has all the names of those affected and killed around the sides of it. I think the memorial should be built right where the bombings took place in Boston, Massachusetts.
1. The memorials that I chose to read about are the 9/11 Memorial, the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and the Korean War Memorial. My favorite memorial was the 9/11 Memorial because 9/11 was a day that no american will ever forget and it impacted so many families. The construction began in 2006 but it was recently finished and opened September 11, 2011. The 9/11 Memorial was constructed by architect Michael Arad and structural engineer groups WPS Cantor Seinuk and Burro Happold. Another beautiful memorial that I read about was the Pearl Harbor Memorial which was made in the remembrance of the 1,117 crewman who lost their lives after Japan had hit Pearl Harbor. Architect Alfred Preis constructed the Pearl Harbor Memorial which was open and dedicated in 1962. Lastly, I read about the Korean War Memorial. The Korean War was one of the toughest and devastating wars, 54,246 Americans died while 8,200 remain missing and 103,284 were injured. The memorial represents the 5.8 million soldiers who served in the war and it was opened July 27, 1995.
ReplyDelete2. After reading about all three memorials I strongly believe that all of them should have been built. The 9/11 Memorial should have been built because 9/11 will always be a tragedy that no one will forget. It was a day where thousands of innocent people died from a terrorist attack. Many families suffered from this and still suffer with the loss of their family member(s) today. The Memorial recognizes that terrible day that should always be remembered and the people who lost their lives. The other Memorial that I believe should have been built is the Korean War Memorial. Before reading the article, I had already visited the memorial last year in Washington, D.C. I did not know much about the Korean War or why the memorial was built but I can sure say that the memorial was powerful and beautiful. It definitely should have been built because it is a forgotten war that many do not give it as much attention as they do to other wars. Also, my Grampy fought in the Korean War so the memorial makes me feel closer to him. Lastly, I think that the Pearl Harbor Memorial should have been built because it happened a long time ago but was such a deadly and tragic event that we do not want it to be forgotten ever. Not many schools teach about Pearl Harbor and this generation was not here to experience it so I think that the memorial gives us a chance to look back on the event and learn about it. All three of these memorials represent such important events that should never be forgotten because they are now history.
3. Now that I have seen and learned about the other memorials and noticed that there is no World War 1 Memorial, I believe that it is reasonable that there is not one. World War 1 did not involve the U.S. as much as World War 2 did, it was mostly within Europe and surrounding countries over there. In World War 2 many more Americans died and served in that war who should be remembered. They gave up their lives fighting for our country. I think that Americans can connect better with World War 2 because it involved people that could have been their relatives or someone close to them.
4. The Boston Marathon tragedy definitely deserves a memorial. It was a terrorist attack and I believe that all terrorist attacks should be remembered through a memorial because many terrorist attacks involve deaths of innocent people. The Boston Marathon was a tragic event that everyone in Massachusetts can connect to because it happened right here in our capitol. I think it should be built as soon as possible, perhaps in a few years. My ideas for the look of the memorial are a runner with a shirt that says “Boston Strong” on it and then a platform that has all the names of those affected and killed around the sides of it. I think the memorial should be built right where the bombings took place in Boston, Massachusetts.
I agree with the your opinion on that there should be a Boston Marathon Memorial to honor the victims and those that died because it an important part of history and it should be built as soon as possible. I like your idea on the runners shirt "Boston Strong" I think ti would be a good idea to have all the runners where the shirts next year before they run in the Marathon to honor the innocent people that were killed.
DeleteI agree that there should be a Boston Marathon Memorial. It was an important tragedy that effected more than the people of Boston. I agree that there should be a memorial because people died. I also agree that it should be built in a couple of years. I would like it to be as soon as possible once the details are decided.
Delete1. I read about the World War II Memorial and the Korean War Memorial. Friedrich St. Florian’s winning design for the World War II Memorial was selected by the General Services Administration’s Public Building Service. He was selected to work alongside a team of five other people. George E. Hartman, Oehme van Sweden & Associates (landscape architect), Ray Kaskey (sculptor) and Nick Benson (stone carver and letterer) were his other colleagues. The primary design was officially approved in 1999 and all designs were approved by 2003. However, construction began in September 2001.The Korean War Memorial also had multiple designers. The nineteen stainless steel statues were sculpted by Frank Gaylord and cast by the Tallix Foundries of Beacon, New York. The mural wall was designed by Louis Nelson of New York in 1986, and was dedicated in 1995.
ReplyDelete2. I think the 9/11 memorial should definitely have been built. Although it continues to be a costly and laborious project, the end result will honor all of the victims who were murdered. It will forever serve as a memory of a tragic event that cannot be forgotten because of how cruel and threatening it was. It also helped to console all of the victims’ families by ensuring that they had a chance to show how their loved ones were assets to society. The World War II and Korean War Memorials were created and should have been built for similar reasons. They are slightly different because they honor all who fought in the war whether they be deceased or living. Although memorials do not change the fact that people died, they bring justice to what occurred in a non-offensive way and help inform the public of the truth. They preserve historical events.
3. Based on the other memorials, I think there should be a World War I memorial because it was one of the most deadly wars in history and had many casualties. The soldiers who fought on the US’ side in the war should be honored in some way even though it happened many years ago. It led to a series of other events that have memorials, such as the World War II memorial and the Holocaust Memorial Museum, so I do not understand why there is not a memorial dedicated to this war. Students and young people need to be educated on this subject so it is not forgotten, and an absence of a World War I memorial conveys the message that it is unimportant or not worthy of the money. The only reason why it would not need to be built is if the World War II and Holocaust Memorial were not built, but that is not the case.
4. While I do not think it is my position to say whether the Boston Marathon tragedy deserves a memorial, I do not think a large memorial should be built. I am not saying this because only three people were murdered--the amount of deaths should not matter. I feel as though the memorial will not bring justice to what happened. All of the facts regarding what happened that day are still unclear and all of the people involved are still unknown. Perhaps if all of the information is figured out in a few years, the subject of a memorial would be less of an issue. It was a terrorist attack, and unlike the 9/11 memorial that also honors the people who risked their lives to rescue those in danger and inform the public, this memorial may just scare people since it proved there is not much Americans can do to stop these attacks from happening. It has happened twice and can happen again. I feel terrible for those people that were killed, but the thousands or millions of dollars that would be spent to create a memorial could go to a more useful cause such as defending our nation against matters like this. If the Boston tragedy deserves a memorial, what about the Texas power plant explosion or the drones that killed a sixteen year old boy?All of those were cases of innocent people being killed. It's very hard to draw the line at where the creation of a memorial should be, especially because there are so many cases of people being killed when they did absolutely nothing to deserve it.
I was particularly interested in your fourth response about if the marathon incident should receive a memorial or not, and I agree with you. I was not personally affected by the bombings, and only a few people died. Tons were affected by 9/11 and all kinds of horrible deaths occurred. Money is pretty tight, especially since we went to war after 9/11, and so many other incidences, like Sandy Hook and the ones you mentioned, should also deserve a memorial if the marathon will
DeleteI disagree with you, about the Boston Marathon Memorial idea. I do not think that a memorial can do justice to any event that happens, but they need to be remembered. Does this mean that you don't think there should be a 9/11 memorial because all it would do is scare people? I do like your point about money though, that could definitely be an issue. I think if the memorial was small then we could have some money to spend on creating a memorial.
DeleteI do think that the 9/11 memorial should have been built, as I said in my second response. I just feel as though the Boston Marathon reminded many Americans that our prevention methods for dealing with terrorist attacks have not worked, which may scare people. 9/11 was the first of its kind in the U.S., and a memorial did not solve the problem. I agree with your opinion on a small memorial, though, that seems really reasonable.
DeleteI agree with Olivia. I think that a small memorial like the Holocaust Memorial in Boston would be a good way to honor the Boston bombing and those who suffered but I don't think it should be something as large scale as the 9/11 Memorial because other attacks have happened since 9/11 and some of those have larger deaths than that of the bombing in Boston like the school shootings in Connecticut and that isn't receiving a Memorial.
DeleteI agree with the points you made in your response to #4. It seems soon to immediately jump into the project of creating a monument for the marathon bombings, because, as you said, the details surrounding this event are not entirely clear at this point. It seems as though some time should be allowed to pass so that this event can be less of a current developing issue. One there is a more solidified story, a small memorial at the site could do a good job of honoring those who were killed or injured that day.
DeleteJen Kallin
ReplyDelete1. I read about the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, which was designed by Maya Ying Lin, an undergraduate of Yale University. The memorial was finished in late October. On November 13th, 1982, it was dedicated to all those brave military soldiers and veterans. I also watched a video about the 9/11 memorial, which is located at Ground Zero, and designed by Michael Arad, a worker of Handel Architects. It was built in 2006 and opened on September 11th in 2011, where a service was held for those who died. I also read about the Pearl Harbor memorial, which was designed by Alfred Pries. The construction started in 1958 and was finally built in 1961. It is built at the site of where the USS Arizona sunk on December 7th, 1941.
2. I think all the memorials I read about should be in existence. It is true that they represent all the casualties and loss in pride, but it also represents the strength of America pulling together and honoring those who gave their lives and effort to protect and serve our country. I think a memorial like the ones in Washington D.C and the one at Pearl Harbor itself are important to have there because many visit the nation's capital and Pearl Harbor, so everyone needs to see those who fought to defend America. The 9/11 memorial, to me, is almost like an apology to our nation that says "how could we let this happen?" because no one knew something like this would happen. When they see it firsthand alongside photos and memories of the deceased is reality punching people in the face.
3. World War 1 was a rather interesting war. America had more casualties in World War I than Pearl Harbor. I think that there should definitely be something to honor and remember the many that died in the war. I am kind of surprised that nothing was done for a memorial for World War 1. Of course, there are small memorials of the First World War, which certainly have significance, If a memorial were to be built, I would have thought that it would be built not too long after the war itself. Obviously, the country was going through an economic recession between the first and second World Wars, so it might have seemed like a waste of money. People lost family and friends due to the war, and something like a tragic loss is not forgotten, but there should be some kind remembrance, something tangible.
4. I fear that my answer to a question like this might seem insensitive, but I personally do not think there should be a memorial for the Boston Marathon tragedy. I understand that people lost people and others were seriously injured, which is horrible that three people died. However, there are worse things that happen in the country like the shootings. In other countries, bombs go off all the time. People fear to walk in the streets of their own country wondering if they will live. We should appreciate that we have a safe country to live in. We are honored to host the Boston Marathon, and it should be remembered as the race that brings people from all over to run for inspiration. It should not be remembered as the event that people were bombed at. There are events like 9/11 where tons of people were lost and the country was really hit with sadness because so many were affected. If something is going to be made to represent the strong people who were impacted by the bombs, then it should be something small, like a statue.
I agree with your answer to question two that all of the memorials should exist since like you said it allows people to know who fought for our country and it shows just how strong our country truly is. I also agree with question three that there should be a memorial built for World War I since something that tragic and historic should not be forgotten. Finally I understand that you don't believe we need a memorial for the Boston bombing since it was as large as other memorials and that we would have to constantly make memorials for shootings and other horrible events, but I still believe one is necessary to remember those lost and honor those who helped the survivors and catch the terrorists.
Delete1. An addition to the 9/11 Memorial I chose to read about the Pearl Harbor Memorial and the World War II Memorial. The 9/11 Memorial sends a power message about how September 11, A day that shall never be forgotten when innocent people had their lives taken away from them. The Memorial was constructed in 2006 by architect Michael Arad and Cantor Seinuk and Burro Happold,part of structural engineer groups. Another unforgettable Memorial, Pearl Harbor was constructed by architect Alfred Preis in 1958 and was completed in 1961. The Pearl Harbor Memorial is located on the site of the final resting place of the USS Arizona on December 7th,1941 and was built to honor the 1,177 crewmen that lost their lives. I also chose to read about the World War II Memorial that was constructed by Leo A Daly an international architecture firm that chose St.Florian’s as the design architect and the rest of the winning team. The team also included George E. Hartman, an Architect, Oehme Van Sweden and Associates landscape architect, Ray Kaskey a sculptor, and Letterer and stone carver Nick Benson. The construction began in September 2001 and was opened to the Public on Saturday, May 29, 2004. This Memorial was built to Honor the 16 million that that served in the armed forces during the war and the 400,000 who died serving in the war and the millions of supporters of the war at home.
ReplyDelete2. I believe that every single of these Memorials were beautifully constructed and each had an important and significant reason behind why they were built. One of the main goals behind why memorials are built because people do not want the world forgetting the events and people that shaped our country to what it has become today. It is upsetting to see some of these memorials but they are a key part to History and every part of each story the good or the bad should be taught to make sure it is never again repeated in history. The 9/11 Memorial displays all the stories from the beginning to the end of 9/11 including pictures of those who died, voice calls of the victims made to their loved ones before they died and voice recordings of the family members who lost their loved ones describe the type of person they were. I also believe the Pearl Harbor and World War II Memorials each had similar but powerful and meaningful reasons to why they were built. The Pearl Harbor Memorial was built to honor the crewmen who died that day and the World War II Memorial was built to honor the the armed forces who fought to protect our country and those who died protecting it.
3. After reading and being educated on the Memorials listed above throughout the years I believe there is no good reason behind not having a World War 1 Memorial and that it should be taught into more depth in Schools. United States soldiers fought and died in this war so there should be a Memorial to honor them as well. I am aware that at the time they might not have had the money to make a Memorial but now even though the war was a long time ago does not mean that there should not still be a Memorial made. For the future generations a Memorial should be present for them to understand the tragedies of war and what it can do to many countries, families and people.
4. I absolutely believe that there should be a Memorial to honor the Boston Marathon victims and the volunteers and Policeman that helped on the search. My ideas on a memorial is to honor those next year before the Boston Marathon and Honor those who died and those who played a major role in helping the injured after the attack. I also believe there should be a Marble ribbon that is entitled “Boston Strong” and has the names of the those who died that day engraved. The the memorial I think should be built this year to not let people forget the heroes that helped the injured the people that died. The Boston Marathon Tragedy should never be forgotten because even though it is very upsetting it is an important part of history and should be a reminder to the world to never let it happen again.
I agree with you that there definatley needs to be a WWI memorial. I also think it needs to be taught more in depth and even if there is no money now, they could build one later. Memorials are needed to rember events in history and WWI was an important event.
Delete1) The memorials I learned about were the 9/11 Memorial, the Pearl Harbor Memorial and the Korean War Memorial. The 9/11 Memorial construction began in 2006 and opened on September 11, 2011. The 9/11 Memorial was constructed by architect Michael Arad a worker of Handel Architects, he worked as a New York City Housing Authority architect before winning the competition to design the Memorial. It was also designed and built by Peter Walker and Partners, Davis Brody Bond, Snøhetta, and Structural engineer WSP Cantor Seinuk, and Buro Happold. Another memorial I read about, the Pearl Harbor Memorial was constructed by Alfred Preis which was opened and dedicated in 1962. The construction started in 1958 and was finally built in 1961. The sight is showing where the USS Arizona sunk on December 7th, 1941 after being bombed by Japan killing 1,177 men. The last memorial I read about was the Korean War Memorial consisting of nineteen stainless steel statues that were sculpted by Frank Gaylord and casted by the Tallix Foundries of Beacon, New York. A mural wall that was designed by Louis Nelson of New York in 1986, and fabricated by Cold Spring Granite Company, Cold Spring, MN. The muralist, sculptor and architect worked closely to create a two dimensional picture with three dimensional effects. This memorial was dedicated on July 27, 1995.
ReplyDelete2) I strongly believe all of the memorials should have been built. They are representing the things our country has gone through and all of the brave souls who have been proud to call themselves American. For example the 9/11 memorial shows how much chaos our country can endure and what our history contains. It also gives the family members and friends a place to reminisce and pray for their loved ones souls. The Pearl Harbor Memorial like all other memorials lets people know what happened to make it a special place, and again it lets family and friends remember the loved ones lost. Finally the Korean War Memorial should be built since it again reminds us of our countries history and all the brave souls who have fought to protect us. These memorials like all others are necessary when something so tragic happens so that we never forget.
3) I think there should be a World War I memorial in Washington, D.C. because it is an important event that our country was a part of and American’s died. The memorial will teach the young what happened and let people directly affected by the war think about whom they lost or what happened. I understand the main argument against it would probably be how long ago it took place and how much it would cost, but it is only fair that we remember all that fought for our country now and from the past.
4) I think the Boston bombing should have a memorial but only a small one since it didn’t kill as many Americans and we don’t have a lot of money to pay for a large memorial. If it does get built it should be in about five or ten years since people will still remember it and it won’t be such an old thing like World War I or anything like that. Also the memorial should talk about the innocent killed and the noble police, fire department, doctors and other helpful people that took care of the injured and caught the terrorist responsible. I am not entirely sure what this memorial should look like it is hard to capture exactly what happened that day. I am sure it would be a very virtual and high tech memorial since we are more advanced now and there are more videos and pictures of what happened. This was a very traumatic even and it should be remembered in history not only the innocent dead but the way our country responded.
Nick Chaves
DeleteI agree with you that there should be a World War I memorial. It was a really important event that our country was a part of and a lot of American's did die. I do think we should wait until though until we have the funding to build a really good memorial though. You are right, we do not have a lot of money, and it would certainly cost a lot of money to build a really nice memorial in Washington DC. Maybe they should wait until our economy picks up again so we can build a really nice memorial for the victims and veterans of World War I. I also agree with you that it is only fair that there be a memorial for World War I. I also like the idea of having a small memorial. It would be nice to have. I still think though it would be better to just run the marathon again, overcome this tragic event, and move on just like they are with the Newtown Shootings.
I agree with you on all the opinion questions. I think all of the memorials that have been made were needed in order to remember all of the American citizens who have lost their lives. Also I do agree there should be a WWI memorial because it was a very important event in our nations history. Finally I also agree that having a small memorial in the city of Boston for those who lost their lives in the Boston marathon bombings is something we should have but nothing to the scale of the other memorials on this list.
DeleteI agree with you on the World War I memorial. All of the other wars have a memorial so why not this one. Even if it was such a long time ago. People need to be reminded that this happened
DeleteNick Chaves
ReplyDelete1. I read about the World War II Memorial and the Korean War Memorial. The World War II was opened to the public on April 29th, 2004. It was designed by Friedrich St.Florian, who is from Providence, Rhode Island. The other Memorial I read about, which was the Korean War Memorial, was designed by two different people. The designer of the mural of the Korean War Memorial was Louis Nelson of New York. The person who designed the statues of the Korean War Memorial was Frank Gaylord of Barre of Vermont. The Korean War Memorial was completed on July 27, 1995.
2. After learning about the construction of World War II, Korean War, and 9/11 memorials I think that all these memorials should have been made. It is a really good way for the public to honor those who lost their lives in all these events. I also believe that the hero’s that died in these events deserve a really nice memorial. It is the least we can do for them. If these memorials were not built there are other ways the events could be remembered. We could have a national holiday specifically for those events or we could have created a movie about the events. A memorial honestly is the best way to remember these events.
3. I think there should be a World War I Memorial in Washington DC. It seems like every major war the United States has fought in has been honored with a memorial in Washington DC. I feel like it is a little unfair that the veterans and victims of World War I don’t get a memorial. I think that World War I was a major event in the United States history and the veterans and victims of World War I, deserve to be honored by the public, with a nice memorial built in our nation’s capital.
4. As a person who is in the NewEngland area and loves Boston, I would personally love to see a memorial built for the tragedies Boston has recently had. As much as I hate to say it I feel that there shouldn’t be a memorial built for the tragedies Boston recently had. Yes it did affect the whole nation, but I see the tragedies in Boston like the Newtown Shootings. Both these events were really sad and shook the whole nation, but they weren’t big enough to have a memorial. I feel memorials should only be built if it affects the United States and the World. For example 9/11, World War II, Vietnam War, Korean War, and even 9/11 all impacted the United States and the world. All these events have memorials and they rightfully should. The Boston Marathon Bombings really just affected the United States. It is just like the Newtown shootings, it didn’t affect the world it just really affected the United States. I think it would be better to just to move on, run the Boston Marathon again, and just heal from this tragedy just like they are with the Newtown Shootings.
Nick, I'm sorry but I do not agree with what you have stated about the Boston bombings, I think there should be a memorial for it. They were terrorists attacking Boston to get back at America has a whole. It was not as big because many bombs were actually found before they were able to go off. It is a big experience for Boston to go through and I believe it should remembered because it will go down as Boston's first attack. Other than your last post, I agree with everything else you are saying.
Delete1) The articles I read about were the 9/11 museum, the Pearl Harbor memorial, and the Gettysburg memorial. Alice Greenwald is the director of the 9/11 Museum. Joe Daniels is the president of the museum. It is still currently being built. The Gettysburg Battlefield Memorial Association was a group of concerned citizens, who designed the memorial. It was designed in 1864. Alfred Preis was the architect of the Pearl Harbor Memorial. The memorial was approved in 1958 and dedicated in 1962.
ReplyDelete2) I believe that each one of these memorials should definitely have been built. They are important times in history that deserve to be remembered. In each of these events, family members and the people of American suffered pain and loss, something that cannot be forgotten. Future generations need to understand that these events are important and that they can be learned from. I believe that a memorial can fit so much information about what happened during that time. I believe it is the best way for people to respect those who lost their lives during the events.
3)I think there should be a World War 1 Memorial because people were hurt and killed in this war as well as many others. The veterans of this war should have something to show that they are respected and thanked for their bravery and help to protect our country. Those killed should have a way of remembrance for their family members who suffered from their death. I believe that this war is just as important as any other.
4)I think that what happened at the Boston Marathon should have a memorial because it caused a lot of suffering for our country. This event will eventually become a lesser topic, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be remembered. It should be small and built in Boston, near where the bombs were set. It would be a good way for family members to remember those lost and those affected by it. Although the death count was not very high, America did a great deal of suffering and mourning for this tragedy. There would not be a lot of information about this event because there are only a few big points, but it should still be remembered.
I agree with you that there should be a Boston Marathon memorial. It did cause a lot of suffering and loss and even shock to everyone around here. I don't agree one hundred percent on the thought that the topic will become lesser because I think that especially after this tragedy, us here in Massachusetts will always be more cautious and remembering that day. Although there might not be a lot of information to include in this memorial, there is more than enough love and thought that families of the victims could put into this memorial in order to remember their innocent family members who have passed.
Delete1. I read about the Vietnam Veterans memorial and the National WWII memorial. The Vietnam memorial was designed by a Yale student named Maya Ying Lin in 1981, Lins design was chosen to be built. On November 13th 1982 it was dedicated to the soldiers. I also read about the WWII memorial was designed by Friedrich St.Florian, an Architect from RI. He was chosen to work alongside five other people who all helped in the design. His original design was approved in 1999 and the other designs were approved in 2003.
ReplyDelete2. I do think that the 9/11 memorial, the Vietnam memorial and the WWII memorial should have been built. The memorials are built in dedication of people who lost their lives in war or due to a terrorist attack. I think that the people need to be remembered. I especially think the 9/11 memorial needed to be built, it shows that we won’t forget what happened and how we can learn from what happened that day.
3. I do think their should be a WWI memorial in D.C. I think WWI was an important war that led up to WWII. I think that not having a memorial in D.C makes it seem not as important. Although WWII seems “more important”, there were still casualties. I don’t think that the number of deaths in a war should determine if it is important or not. Memorials are ways to remember the people who died and I think the WWI veterans deserve that.
4. I do not think the Boston bombing deserves a memorial like they have in D.C. I don’t think we should disregard what happened but it doesn’t have the same significance as war or 9/11. I think if they were to make a Boston memorial they’d have to to make one for every tragic thing that happens in our country. If they did decide to make a memorial I think it should be something small not a huge structure. Also, I don’t think it should be Nationally recognized just one in Boston. Although the bombing should not be forgotten I do not think a big memorial should be made.
I especially agree with the point you made that if a Boston Memorial were to be built, then memorials for every tragic event would have to be built. This would be financially grueling for the government when they could use the money to help resolve the issues that caused the tragic events. Although it is unfortunate, some incidents cause more chaos and deaths than others and therefore need more attention brought to them. Perhaps memorials for less disastrous events should be made with a smaller budget to help ease the public's distress.
Delete1. I read about the Vietnam Veterans memorial and the Pearl harbor Memorial. The Pearl harbor memorial was designed by Alfred Preis and was dedicated to pearl harbor in 1962. Also Vietnam Veterans memorial was designed by Yale grad Maya Ying Ling and was built in 1981 but dedicated to the soldiers in 1982.
ReplyDelete2. I believe that the 9/11 memorial, the Vietnam memorial, and the Pearl harbor memorial should have been built. They are powerful places of the ones who lost their lives and the victims should be remembered. They are constant reminders of terrible things in our past and we have them so future generation never forget what happened.
3. A world war one memorial definitely should be made in Washington D.C. Any time soldiers lose their lives for the protection of our nation or the world they deserve to be memorialized. Many people forget about WWI because it is over shadowed by WWII and the Holocaust but still thousands of people died and they should be remembered.
4. I think that some sort of memorial should be built but nothing to the scale of the other memorials I have mentioned. This was a terrible tragedy but there were very few deaths in comparison to the other memorials that we have. I think something small in the city of Boston should be made because it will have a powerful and lasting effect but nothing on the national level.
I agree with your decision on the memorial for Boston. There should be something to show our support for the victims, but like you said, nothing on the level of the other memorials we have read about.
Delete1) The memorials I read about where the Pearl harbor and World War 2 memorials. The Pearl Harbor memorial was designed by Alfred Preis. The idea of the memorial began in 1942 but the first real steps were not taken until the year 1949. It first started when the Commander in Chief, Admiral Arthur Radford resurrected the flag from the from the sunken ship. After that on the ninth anniversary a "commemorative plaque" was built below the flag and finally completed in 1961. The World War 2 memorial was designed by Friedrich St.Florian, who was an architect in Providence, R.I. The process of creating the memorial did not start until May 25th, 1993. President Clinton signed it off for the memorial to be in Washington D.C to acknowledge the more than 400,000 that have died. honoring the men and women that served in the armed services, and everyone impacted from it.
ReplyDelete2) I believe that memorials definitely should be built. This is because they are remembering what America has been through, all the people that have served in helping the traumatic events and everyone who has died. It is a place where everyone is able to visit and learn all the details about it. If these memorials were still not around, future generations will not know the true impact America went through with stories and books. Memorials show the real artifacts and truth behind everything. It gives family and friends a place to grieve and reminisce of the events and a where the memories of so many people can remain. It most important for the future generations so they can know what it was really like, from all the the chaos to heartbreak.
3)From reading the other memorials, I do not see why there is not a memorial for World War 1. That was one of the worst wars in history with tremendous casualties. The men fighting in that war should be honored with a memorial, even though America was not involved as much as World War 2, many lives were still lost and people should be honored for what they achieved. There is not much difference from this war to other events in history that got memorials. It follows the same criteria and was a gruesome and heartbreaking war. Families should have a place to show respect and remembrance of the deaths they went through. It would be great if they were able to establish one for future generations to see and experience what happened as well.
4)I strongly believe that the Boston Marathon bombing should have a memorial. This was the first attack Boston has ever had and even though only a few people may have died the overall attack was brutal and heartbreaking. The fact that the bombed a very well known marathon that was for a good cause and for the Newtown victims this year is terrible. Many people were injured and it was a huge experience for Boston, it really made our community come together and it would be a great to to have a memorial for what we were put through, the people that died and got severely hurt, and all the men and women in and out of Boston that helped during this traumatic event.
I most definitely agree with you when you said that the Boston bombing should have a memorial and I think you gave a great point when comparing it to the Newtown victims and the event that happened there.
Delete1.) I read about the World War II memorial and the Pearl Harbor Memorial. The World War II memorial was authorized for construction on May 25, 1993. Construction began in 2001 and wasn't finished until 2004. The architect for the memorial was chosen from six finalists Friedrich St.Florian being the winner. This memorial was designed to honor the 16 million who served in the armed forces and the 400,000 who died in the war. The Pearl Harbor Memorial is actually called the USS Arizona Memorial as it honors the attack on the ship which cost over 1,177 people who lost their lives on the ship. Ideas for the Memorial were first considered in 1943 but it wasn't until 1958 that President Eisenhower approved construction of the Memorial which was finished in 1961 and was designed by Alfred Preis who's idea behind the design was it to allow each individual person to experience their innermost feelings.
ReplyDelete2.) I think that all of these Memorials should have been built because they honor a substantial amount of people who lost their lives in a tragic event. They help future generations remember what happened to their ancestors and know the histories of their countries as well be able to see the affects that those who died had on the history of America.
3.)Yes I do believe there should be a World War I Memorial and I am wondering why they haven't already built one. The people who lost their lives in that war or fought for our country and lived are not any different from those of other tragedies and wars. Why are their lives and stories not honored in a Memorial. I think the right thing to do is build a Memorial for those people but after all these years I think it is unlikely that one will be built.
4.)I think that there should be a Memorial for those who lost their lives at the Boston Marathon bombing to honor the people who suffered but also to show an important day of America's history. However I don't think it should be at the same level as the 9/11 Memorial or the World War II Memorial as not as many people lost their lives that day.
I agree with you when you say that we should have a memorial for the people who lost their lives in Boston. And I think you are right when you say it should not be as grand as the 9/11 Memorial because it was important, but not as tragic to as many lives as it was in New York with the situation of the twin towers.
DeleteBhumi Patel
ReplyDeleteAmerican Memorials Reflection
1. The memorials I read about were the National World War II Memorial and the Lincoln Memorial, both located in Washington DC, the capital of our country. The World War II Memorial, built in honor of those who fought for our country, was the idea of President Bill Clinton. Designed by architect Friedrich St.Florian, an architect based in Providence, Rhode Island, this memorial was managed to be built by General Services Administration’s (GSA) Public Buildings Service in 2003. The Lincoln Memorial, located in the same area as the World War II memorial, was designed by architect Henry Bacon who modeled the memorial after the Greek temple known as the Parthenon. It was finished being built in 1922, by Daniel Chester French.
2. By thinking of the reasoning behind the construction of all three of the memorials I learned about, including the Lincoln Memorial, National World War II Memorial, and the 9/11 Memorial, I think the memorials should have been built and think it is good how they were. I think that because those memorials were built in honor of and as a memory of those who fought for others or lost their lives for them. So they definitely should be kept because those who worked hard for others should be remembered in a memorial that represent them.
3. There is no World War I memorial in Washington, D.C. After reading about the other memorials, I think that there should be one because the people who fought in World War I are not any different of those who fought in World War II. They both should be remembered forever for fighting for their country and that is why I think there should be one.
4. I think the recent tragedy in Boston does deserve a memorial. I think it should be built in around 10 years because with all the controversy going on about it right now, it would be too soon to build it in 5 years. But, in 10 years it would be perfect for the next generation to learn about it and remember those who lost their lives innocently this year. It should probably look like something that represents both the Connecticut shootings and the explosions in Boston because the marathon in Boston was for the shooting and they are somewhat connected. So, if it is built, it should represent both tragic events in our country.
1.) The memorials I learned about was the 9/11 Memorial, the Pearl Harbor Memorial, and the Korean War Memorial. The construction of the 9/11 Memorial started in 2006 and opened on September 11, 2011. It was constructed by Michael Arad, an architect. According to the video, the 9/11 museum is currently being worked on and will open soon. The Pearl Harbor Memorial was designed by Alfred Preis. The memorial was approved by the President in 1958 and completed in 1961. It was 1962 when the memorial was open and dedicated. The last memorial I learned about was the Korean War Memorial. The nineteen statues to represent the soldiers were sculpted by Frank Gaylord. The mural next to the statues was created by Lois Nelson in 1986. The Memorial was open in 1995.
ReplyDelete2.) I think the three memorials that I learned about should have been created. 9/11 was an event in history that Americans will remember forever. The tragedy resulted in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people. The horrific event affected the whole country. The memorial remembers those who lost their lives by having the 2,983 and plus names on the walls around two pools. The two pools are where the two Twin Towers stood. An event that affected so many people deserves a memorial. The Pearl Harbor was also an event that deserves a memorial. The 1,117 crewmen who lost their lives on December 7, 1941 are remembered through the very large memorial structure. An event where so many lost lives deserves something to honor the dead. The Korean War Memorial is such a fascinating memorial. I got the chance to visit the memorial and it was a wonderful experience. The memorial remembers the 5.8 million Americans who served during the war. Hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives. The mural with the photos and portraits was really interesting. The mural was done very well. The war was one of the most difficult wars to fight and therefore it deserves a memorial.
3.) I think it is hard for me to decide whether World War 1 deserves a memorial. Since people lost their lives I think they should be remembered and thanked for their service. I realize that America was not as much involved in the war than other countries. Considering it has been a very long time since World War 1 happened, there probably will not be a memorial. I think if there is not one already after all of these years then there should not be one at all.
4.) I think the recent tragedy in Boston most certainly deserves a memorial. I think the memorial should be built as soon as possible. The event did not just affect those in Boston. The whole country was affected. Three lost their lives in the bombing and an officer lost his life after the event. Many got severely injured. I will be very upset if they do not have a memorial. I think there should be a memorial in Boston. I think the words “Boston Strong” should be incorporated. I also think the runners should be in the memorial to remember that everyone was there for the marathon. I also think the huge response team and the One Fund should be in the memorial. The police should also be in it.
I agree with you that a Boston bombing memorial should be made very soon. Especially for those who lost their lives and the family's of the loved ones. However I think a small memorial should be made because there wasn't as many who lost their lives. Overall a memorial defiantly should be made no matter the death count because so many were affected by this tragedy.
Delete1. The two memorials I read about we're the Korean War memorial and the Pearl Harbor memorial. The Korean War memorial was dedicated on July 27, 1995 and resembles the 5.8 million lives sacrificed. The three year Korean War was on of the hardest fought wars in Americas history. The creator of the statues was Frank Gaylord and the wall was created by Louis Nelson. The other memorial I read about was the Pearl Harbor memorial, it was completed in 1961 and was official dedicated in 1962. Arthur Radford was the one to ordered that a memorial be established for the sunken battleship.
ReplyDelete2. For the 9/11 memorial I think that everything about it is appropriate for the tragic occurrence in our nation. The event that had occurs in our country caused confusion and sadness upon everyone in different ways. For some people it was harder to deal with things that others with lost family members. I think having this memorial brings closure to family's, and gives them peace in mind. The Korean War memorial I think is not only eye catching but represents the war well. Having the statues make the feeling real along with the wall and the faces on it. I think that this memorial is right for what happened. Along with the Pearl Harbor memorial I think it represents what happened very well. I think it is important to having this memorial to not only remind us of what our country has been through but gives family's closure. For all these memorials I don't think there could be a better way to represent what our country has gone through and the struggles we have all faced.
3. After reading through a few different memorials that have involved America and have impacted society I'm not sure if World War 1 had a big enough impact on our country that a memorial should be made. America was not as involved with this war as others such as the Korean War. Although some may argue that it was still a War and should be remembered, some may also disagree.
4. Nobody has control for what the future will hold so we may never no what the next 5, 10, 50 years will be like. Although the Boston bombing was a terrible and extremely sad event that affected so many innocent people, I'm not sure a big memorial is the way to remember it. I could understand a large memorial being built for a national monument or park being bombed. I do believe a small memorial to honor the lost loved ones and those injured would do justice. All family's need are some closure and having a memorial could help the healing process between the citizens of Boston. Overall I don't think a large memorial will help only a small one in the next 1 to 2 years.
I agree with a lot of what you said, and believe it was thoughtfully written. I agree that the three memorials you chose to write about are necessary, as they offer closure to the many affected by these incidents. Similarly they area good way to pass on these stories of tragedy and do justice to the sacrifice of these people. I disagree that there should not be a World War I memorial, only because I believe anyone who is brave enough to risk their life fighting to uphold the freedoms of their people deserves to be recognized. Although it did not have as large of an impact as the other events you mentioned, I believe (similar to your plan for the Boston bombing Memorials) there should be at the least a small memorial. I also agree that a small memorial would do justice for the Boston bombings. There is no doubt in my mind that there has to be some way to commemorate the lives and injuries of the Boston people. While I believe a large memorial should be erected, a smaller one would also be appropriate. The Boston bombings were not a "nation-wide" event, and therefore a smaller memorial which would provide closure for the families would suffice.
Delete1. I choose to read the articles about the WWII memorial and the Gateway Arch. The WWII memorial was approved in 1993 by President Clinton and the site was dedicated by Clinton in 1995. Friedrich St.Florian, an architect whose design was chosen to be that of the memorial, was a member of the design team along with George E. Hartman, Oehme van Sweden & Associates, Ray Kaskey, and Nick Benson. The design concept was initially approved by the Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission in summer 1998 and various approvals were made from then until 2003 regarding various steps of the project. Construction began in 2001, and in 2004 the memorial was dedicated and opened to the public before care was then turned over to the National Parks Service. The Gateway Arch in St. Louis was designed by architect Eero Saarinen in 1947. Construction took place from 1963 to 1965, and the arch was opened fully to the public in 1968.
ReplyDelete2. I do think these memorials should have been built. It's important to remember and commemorate history, and doing so in a way that everyone can see brings people together in remembrance. They are each simple and represent their respective events in a different way. Each of the events which have had memorials built to commemorate them were impactful on a large scale. They changed the everyday lives of people and how people think, and that's something which needs commemoration. There will not always be people with a first-hand account of these events, something which was mentioned in the video abot the 9/11 museum construction, and there should be a way for future generations to remember history that is not in a classroom, where some kids may not appreciate things the same way they would in a different atmosphere.
3. I, like many others who posted before, never really realized that there is not a significant memorial for WWI. I don't see why there isn't, such a memorial exists for virtually every other war in which the US has played a substantial role throughout history. Although it is older and there are probably fewer people alive today who can directly remember the loss of a family member as a result of this war, the people who were killed in WWI are not people in any lesser sense of the word than people who were killed more recently such as 9/11 victims or soldiers in WWII or Vietnam. Those who were casualties of WWI should have commemoration along with all the others, because this war was a war like any other and people lost lives or family members all the same.
4. I don't think that there should be a huge memorial to remember the Boston Marathon Bombings in the same sense that there is for the other events listed here, however I do think something small on Boylston Street to remember those who were killed or injured would be appropriate. There have been other tragedies with a similar number of casualties, such as the Newtown shootings and the movie theater shootings in Colorado. There is one difference which is that the Boston Marathon bombing is considered terrorism, an act of violence against a whole country, but it doesn't make the killing and injury any different. There should be a memorial to honor the victims of that day, as well as the victims in Newtown, Colorado, Tucson... To the individual families who lost people on each of these days, the world was shattered, just as it was for someone who had a family member in the towers. Although this is the same argument I made when it came to a WWI memorial, I do feel the same way about each. However, these events didn't shake the entire country, the entire world, change the lives of people thousands of miles away, in the same sense that a war or a huge terrorist attack does; this is why I believe that the monument should be small and simple, in the place where this attack occurred.
I meant that there should be something small to remember each of the seperate events I listed (Newtown, Boston) where they happened. That may have been unclear.
Delete1. I read about the World War II Memorial and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. The creation of the World War II Memorial was prompted by President Clinton in 1993. The design was conceived by Friedrich St.Florian. He was selected along with four other people: architects George E. Hartman and Oehme van Sweden, sculptor Ray Kaskey, and stone carver and letterer Nick Benson. Together, they created the Memorial. Construction started in 2001, and was finally completed in 2004. The latter Memorial was founded by Jan Scruggs, a veteran of the war. The design was created by Maya Ying Lin, an undergraduate at Yale. Construction for the Memorial started in 1982, and was completed in 1984.
ReplyDelete2. The memorials I read about both commemeroated the U.S.'s contribution to the wars, in which America received heavy losses. They affected the country as a whole, so they deserved a memorial of such a scale. The same goes for 9/11. Along with the memorial for 9/11, will be a museum. According to the video, it will tell the true story of the event, no matter how graphic. It will include pictures of employees jumping from the towers, phone calls from flight attendants, and pictures of the nearly 3,000 citizens who died in the attack. This material is all crucial to really understanding and feeling what happened.
3. A small World War I Memorial does exist in Washington D.C., but it only commemorates the citizens who took part in the War who were from the District of Colombia (D.C.). I would like to see a World War I Memorial that honors all of the Americans who took part in the War. They fought on our behalf to protect our freedom, and should be remembered for it. Although the U.S. wasn't as involved in WWI as they were in WWII, soldiers still fought and died for us.
4. The Boston Marathon Tragedy deserves a small memorial, but nothing compared to the World War II site. A site near the blast area where people can put things like flowers, I think would be sufficient. We've had a few other similar incidents, as far as domestic terror goes this past year: the Aurora, Colorado Shootings and the Newtown Shootings. They don't have huge memorials; just places where people put items to remember their loved ones. I think the same should be done for Boston.
1. I read about the USS Arizona Pearl Harbor Memorial and the National WWII Memorial. The USS Arizona was designed by architect Alfred Preis, and its creation was approved by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1958. Its construction was completed in 1961, and it was later dedicated in 1962. The National WWII Memorial was designed by a team of designers lead by Friedrich St. Florian. The ensemble also included architect George E. Hartman, landscape architect Oehme van Sweden, sculptor Ray Kaskey, and stone carver and letterer Nick Benson. In 1993 President Clinton signed public law authorizing the ABMC to establish the memorial, but it was not until April 29, 2004 that the memorial opened to the public, and a month later it was dedicated.
ReplyDelete2. When taking into account the purpose of these memorials, I strongly believe they should have been built. The construction of these monuments is warranted by the fact that their purpose is to commemorate the lives of those who died in tragic events which have shaped America as a whole. Some events in history must never be forgotten, and the innocent who were brutally murdered in the 9/11 and Pearl Harbor attacks must be remembered. The Valiant soldiers who served and lost their lives for the protection of the American people and the American Dream must be honored for their contribution to the well-being of our country. These devastating events and the people lost represent the wounds of the American people, and above all else that this country has suffered, but that we have prevailed.
3. After reading about the other memorials, I believe there should be one that recognizes the veterans that upheld the American ideals of freedom and democracy in World War I. Every American soldier should be honored for their role in protecting the people of their country, and it is unjust that those who suffered the horrors of World War I are not given due treatment for their service. These people have suffered so much, and it must not be in vain. They were able to create a safer America, but their sacrifice must never be forgotten.
4. I believe the recent tragedy of the Boston Marathon bombings deserves a memorial to honor those who were injured and the lives that were taken by this tragic act of hatred. Furthermore this memorial would be a testament to the strength of the American people, and how we make something from our suffering. This monument would be erected as soon as possible, so that it can be remembered for generations to come. Hundreds of police and emergency response teams rushed to the scene of the bombings, saving thousands of lives, and risking their own for the well-being of the people. Although these events scar the American people, these wounds heal over time and eventually make the people stronger. This tragic event united the nation, showing how the American people support one another in their time of need. This is why I envision a memorial where it shows the brave men and women who helped evacuate the area, saving thousands, rescuing an injured runner. This demonstrates the courage, strength and values of the Boston people and would be a good way to show that we mourn the death and injuries of the people, but have grown stronger as a nation because of these events.
I agree with that all of these monuments should have been built. They are needed to express what hate has created and how we as a country has came together from time to time again, to stop this hate.
DeleteI agree that the response teams were vital to saving as many people who survived. I think that not only should the victims be memorialized, but those who put their lives on the line should also be memorialized in their bravery.
Delete1. I chose to read about the Pearl Harbor Memorial and also the Korean War Memorial. The Pearl Harbor Memorial was built by Alfred Preis which was opened and dedicated in 1962. The construction started in 1958 and was finished in 1961. The Korean War Memorial was sculpted by Frank Gaylord and casted by the Tallix Foundries of Beacon, New York. These sculptures are of different types of men who fought to protect our country. They show different branches of the military, different races, and different rankings, working together through the rice paddies of Korea. A mural wall that was made by Louis Nelson of New York in 1986, and fabricated by Cold Spring Granite Company, Cold Spring, MN.. This memorial was dedicated on July 27, 1995. The mural also expresses all the branches of military through photographs sketched in the stone. The two pieces of art to create one giant vision of heroism and sacrifice.
ReplyDelete2. After learning about all of these memorials, I do believe that they should have been created. A lot of people in this world are clueless to their surroundings and do not know what is going on. They miss out on learning how these tragedies happened, and more importantly, how they were brought to justice. I do not think any details should be kept hidden from society. It is important to know the truth no matter how terrible it really is. Just like with the discussions on what they should and should not include in the 9/11 Memorial, they need to have everything so they know what the true story is. Some things should be an option if they do not want to see it but it needs to be offered.
3. Now that I realize there is no World War I Memorial, I think that it is ridiculous! I do not understand why you could possibly exclude something as tragic as that. It was supposed to be the war to end all wars, and it led to the second world war. I personally do not know a ton about World War I, so a memorial could absolutely help people like myself be educated on the topic. People died during that time. Why would anyone disagree with creating a Memorial to recognize those who did their best to protect us.
4. I do believe that a memorial should be built for the marathon bombings. Not a huge as the 9/11 memorial but something small. It has to be near where the bombs were set off in order for it to be even more meaningful. Even though not many people were hurt in this attack, we came together in a time of need to hunt those who hurt us. Only in a matter of days they were stopped. We did not know their further intentions, but one was captured, and one was killed fighting against our law enforcement. If our State did not react and be Boston Strong, who knows if they would have been caught or what they were planning for the future.
I do not agree with you on the Boston Marathon bombing memorial because the bombing only killed a small fraction of people compared to a war or 9/11. Also if we were to create a memorial where would the money for it come from?
Delete1. I read about the 9/11 memorial, World War II memorial, and the Vietnam War memorial. The 9/11 memorial was designed and created by Michael Arad, Cantor Seinuk, and Burro Happold. Its construction began in 2003 and was finished in 2011. The World War II Memorial was proposed by Bill Clinton in 1993. The design was created by Friedrich St. Florian. He was chosen along with George E. Hartman, Oehme van Sweden, Ray Kaskey, and Nick Benson. It began construction in 2001 and construction was completed in 2003. The Vietnam War memorial was designed by Maya Ying Lin. Construction began in 1982 and was completed in 1984.
ReplyDelete2. I think that all of these memorials should have been created. All of these events being commemorated have had a major impact on our country and need to be remembered. Without them the youth and future generations wouldn’t be reminded of this and all of the veterans and survivors would be forgotten about. It is the least we can do to honor the veterans who went through so much to protect our country and for the families of all who have been lost to these events.
3. I defiantly think that there should be a memorial for World War I in D.C. All of the other major wars have memorials and it doesn’t make sense to not have a memorial for this war. There was still a lot of casualty’s in that war that should be commemorated. It isn’t fair to the veterans and those who lost their lives fighting. All of the others wars veterans and casualties were commemorated so why not this war?
4. I personally do not think that there should be a memorial for the Boston Marathon Bombing. We were closer than most during this event so we will have stronger feelings towards this event but it was not something that affected the entire nation. Not a lot of people died and the culprits were captured or killed so there isn’t any need for a memorial in my opinion. 9/11 had an effect on multiple places and people from all over so it was more “important” than this bombing. That is why it got a memorial but I don’t think the bombing should get a memorial.
I disagree with your response and opinion to question 4. Although not many people died during this event, they were still humans. It was not just an attack on 3 people. It was also an attack on hundreds of others who were injured during the event. This attack also attacked America's culture. This marathon is an annual marathon that people from all around the world come to participate in. Although it was not the largest terrorist attack, it still is something to remember in history.
DeleteThalita Campelo
ReplyDelete1. The first memorial I learned about was the 9/11 Museum. It is being constructed by the Museum committee and will be completed next year, 2014, in New York where the two twin towers once were. The second memorial I read about was the Vietnam Memorial. This memorial was started on March 16th, 1982 and completed by November 1st of that same year but only excepted by the President on November 10th of 1984. It was designed by a Yale University student named Maya Ying Lin. The last memorial I read was on the Lincoln Memorial. It started being constructed in 1914 and ended around 1922. The man responsible for the designing of the memorial is named Henry Bacon.
2. I think all three and even all the other memorials I did not read about should have been built. Personally, I believe that there might not be any better way to remember how all these events occurred other than these memorials, which allow us to do so. Although some people may believe that they don't want to hear about whatever tragic the memorial is showing, others may argue that it is good to remember what happened in order to build off of it and continue stronger in the future. These memorials are also important because they can show future generations just how much things have improved and/or changed from the time the events occurred.
3. I do believe that there should be a World War l memorial. I think that this memorial would help us, as the future generations continue to come, to learn more about this war and the importance on how it impacted us as Americans and even the rest of the World. This war did make a big part in our history and it is important to remember it and to continue to talk about it. World War l cannot be forgotten because it was indeed a contribution to the many other happens in American history that helped this place become the America it is today.
4. I think a memorial for the recent tragedy that took place in Boston would be very important. We as common students, teachers, and just ordinary people never even imagine that something like an attack can happen so close to us and unfortunately this year, it did. It would be a great idea to be able to have somewhere that we can take our future generations to and show that we as Americans were able to survive another attack and that we are still here and strong. If this memorial were to be built, it should be soon. We who survived this attack in Massachusetts want to remember the heroes and those innocent people who lost their lives that day and that is why it should be built within the next 2-3 years in my opinion.
I agree with what you said about how all of the momorials should have been built. This are the best way to remebered all of the heroic people in American history or all of the trageditys America has faced. I also beleive that World War I should have a memorial. I also agree with you when you said it wasn't a big part of history but it is important to remeber. I think that's why all memorials are important so that we never forget.
Delete1. The first memorial I read about was the Gateway Arch. It was designed by Eero Saarinen and was finished in October 1965. The second memorial I read about was the Vietnam Memorial. It was completed in November 1984 and it was designed by Maya Ying Lin.
ReplyDelete2. I think all three memorials should have been built. The Gateway Arch shows America’s growth and expansion. I think it should also have been built because it also shows how much America has grown from a young country. I think Vietnam Memorial should have been built because I think every war should have a memorial. Everyone who lost their life fighting for our country deserves to be remembered. I think the wall is especially important because it show us how many people actually do lose their life while fighting for our freedom. I also think the 9/11 Memorial should be built. I think it should have a memorial because the people who died in this tragic accident were just innocent people. A lot of the people who died were also firemen and police that were trying to save the people who were in the buildings. I also think it should be built because something like this should never be forgotten.
3. After reading about the other memorials I think that World War I should have a memorial. It might not have involved America as much but they still played a big role. Also there were still many American’s who lost there life that deserve to be remembered. This war also led to World War II so this should be remembered. Basically every other war has a memorial and I think this one should definitely have one too.
4. I think the tragedy that happened in Boston deserves a memorial. Even though not that many passed away from it many lives were affected. I think there should be one because this is kind of like 9/11 only not as many died from it. Both were terrible and it happened to innocent people. I think it should be built about 10 years from now. A memorial shouldn’t be built too close to right after it happened but we don’t want it to be built a long time from now because people should not forget. I think the memorial should have blue and yellow on it somewhere because that was the color of ribbon for the marathon. I also think that somewhere on the memorial it should say Boston Strong because all of Boston was affected but we stayed strong as a community.
I agree with you response on number 4. I do still think it deserves a memorial even though many people were not killed. Any type of tragic event that impacts many people should have a memorial. It doesn't have to be a large memorial but there should be one to remember the people and I really like your idea of blue, yellow and Boston Strong on the memorial if one was made.
Delete1. The first monument I read about was the 9/11 memorial. The memorial is being built by the Museum committee and will be finished in the year 2014. The second monument I read about was the World War II memorial. It was created by Friedrich St. Florian and was completed in 2003. The third monument I read about was the Vietnam memorial. It was created by Maya Ying Li and created in 1984.
ReplyDelete2. I think that all these memorials should have been created. I believe this because all of these memorials are crated based on major wars that our country has participated in. Because of this the memorials are needed to remember all the people who fought for our country in each war. I do no think that any of the memorials could be built better in any other way.
3. Yes I do think that there should be a World War I memorial because of many reasons. One reason I believe this is because all the other major wars that we ha fought in have their own memorials and this is not fair for the veterans that fought in WWI. I also think that by having a memorial for WWI that it will help later generations learn more about the war.
4. I personally do not believe that there should be a memorial built for the Boston Marathon bombing. I believe this because the bombing was not as big compared to a war where thousands of people died. Also if we created a memorial it would cost a lot of money to build and our country really just doesn't have that money right now. Also the bombing only affected people close to Boston and di not affect the entire nation. That is my opinion on a Boston Marathon bombing memorial.
1.)
ReplyDeleteThe memorials I learned about were the 9/11, Lincoln, and the Korean war memorial. The 9/11 memorial was started in 2006 and constructed by Michael Arad. In the video it talked about the 9/11 museum that will be opening in 2014. The Lincoln memorial I read about was constructed between 1914-1922 and it is in Washington D.C. The people that took part in designing and building this memorial were Henry Bacon, Daniel French, Jules Guerin, Eranest C. Bairstow, Evelyn Longman, Piccirilli brothers and Royal Cotissoz. As I was reading I learned that the Korean war memorial is in Washington D.C. and it was constructed in 1995. The people that built and designed this memorial were Louis Welson and Frank Gaylord.
2.)
After reading and learning more about the memorials I do think they all should have been built. These should have been built because it reflects back to the tragic events that have happened in history. It allows the people to learn more about these events and it lets us remember all of those people. Also it makes future generations learn about the tragedies that happened in the past. If we did not have these memorials our generations would not be able to learn about the past history and remember all of the people that were a part of those tragedies.
3.)
While reading about the other memorials and learning about them I do think there should be a World War I memorial. This memorial should be in Washington D.C. This World War should get a memorial just like World War II did. The Americans in that war should be remembered. Also the memorial that should be made for World War I will teach our generations and future ones more about the past history of the war. This war should not be forgotten because it lead up to other tragic events that occurred in history and it is important to remembered that today and in the future.
4.)
The tragic event that happened in Boston should have a memorial. I think it needs to have a memorial to remember all the people that were involved in this event. This event should have memorial made in the next 5- 10 years if one is going to be made. We should all be able to remember the people who were killed and those who helped with this tragic attack. This memorial could show future generations what had happened that day of the Marathon and let them learn from this. Even though many people were not killed and it was not the same attack as 9/11 it should still be remembered.
I agree with your response for #4, but I do not agree with the fact that all over the world many more cities of people are being bombed, and not all of them are able to be memorialized. It seems as if America almost has too much pride for things that have happened and remembering our horrific events, and it may be more beneficial for us to remember events that happen in other countries just as much to more fully understand that these things happen everywhere, and even though they are equally as important, they cannot all be remembered in the same intensity.
Delete1. The first memorial looked at was the 9/11 Memorial. This memorial is built after the dreadful day of September 11, 2001; the day ever American will never forget. The museum is in the void under the beautiful park where the two buildings used to stand. The director of this museum, Alice Greenwald, has been working on this project since 2006. The museum opened September 11, 2011. The second memorial I read about was the World War II memorial. This memorial honors all who had served throughout the war, the hundred of thousands of US soldiers who had died during the war, as well as the millions who supported the war domestically. The memorial was built by a "winning team" including St. Florian as the design architect, George E. Hartman, Ray Kaskey, and Nick Benson. The construction began in September 2001 and was open to the public on April 29, 2004. The third memorial I read about was the Pearl Harbor Memorial which honors all of the military personnel who died during the Pearl Harbor attacks. This memorial was designed by Alfred Preis. President Eisenhower approved the memorial's creation in 1958 and in 1962, the memorial was dedicated.
ReplyDelete2. All of these memorials were built in remembrance, and memory of these very large, important events. Throughout history there are many events that stick out, whether good or bad it is very good to reflect and remember what they were. Without memorials like these, there would be very little remembrance of these events. On a daily basis you do not encounter something having to do with honor WWII veterans or victims of 9/11. Without these memorials you could only reflect and remember them with your personal thoughts. There would be no "organized" place to truly remember these important events.
3. I believe there should be a World War I memorial simply because it was the first World War. It was the first time there was a very large conflict that did not just affect one portion of the world. It affected the entire world. With this war came death. With these deaths came sadness and memories. It is almost rude to not have a World War I memorial because there are so many family members who in a blink of an eye had to say good-bye to their loved ones.
4. I believe we should also have a Boston Marathon Memorial because it was a terrorist attack. Not only that but it also affected the entire country. Although so little people died, they were still people. They still had family, friends and futures. I believe this memorial should be built within the next 5 years and I believe it will be built in the next 5 years because the Boston Marathon is an annual event unlike many other things that memorials showcase. I do not believe the memorial even needs to be a visual memorial but more of a verbal memorial where everybody could simply give a moment of silence before beginning the marathon. Remembering that chaotic day and praying for the victims and their loved ones.
Joshua Teixeira
ReplyDeleteHonors Blog
6/8/13
1) I read about the National WWII Memorial and the Gateway Arch. The WWII Memorial was designed by a man named Friedrich St.Florian, an architect from Providence Rhode Island, in 1998. The Gateway Arch was designed by Eero Saarinen in 1947. The WWII Memorial is a relatively new memorial, only add in the late ‘90s, this was new to me because I had believed that that memorial had been in Washington for a long time because when I saw it in person it felt as though it were something very permanent. The Gateway Arch, however, is a lot older than I thought. I had thought that it was built, earliest, in the ‘70s, but it was actually built, as I said earlier, in the late 1940s. IT had such a modern feeling, the steel and gravity defying look, that I had believed that it was younger than it actually was.
2) I see a reason for the WWII Memorial and that 9/11 Memorial, but the Gateway Arch is hardly a memorial as much as something that screams “Hey look! We’re America and we can build cool stuff!” Not only is its purpose unclear, but it could have been much easier represented as a museum with artifacts from settlers and pioneers, rather than a giant metal arch.
3) When comparing a possible WWI Memorial in Washington to the WWII Memorial, it is somewhat clear that if there were to be a WWI Memorial, which I think there should be, that it should be smaller. I say this because America obviously had less of a loss of lives in WWI than WWII. Not that that would make it less important, but I feel that it should be represented somehow. Also if there were one, I think there should be a museum with it because many Americans are unaware of what actually went on in WWI.
4) I think that there should be a memorial for the people who died and were affected by the Boston Bombing. I think that whoever who would be working on it should start planning immediately, so it can be opened on the tenth anniversary. I do not think there would be a need for a museum with this memorial, but it would need a list of names and a place for people to donate to amputees. I think it could be a statue, or a pillar of some sort to make the place visible from far away.
1. The first memorial I learned about was the 9/11 memorial. It was designed and is currently being built by Michael Arad along with many others, and is scheduled to open in about a year. The second memorial I read about was the Pearl Harbor Memorial, which was designed by Alfred Preis in 1962. The third memorial I read about was the WWII Memorial which was designed by Friedrich St.Florian and was put together with the help of George E. Hartman of Hartman-Cox Architects, landscape architect Oehme van Sweden & Associates, sculptor Ray Kaskey, and stone carver and letterer Nick Benson and was finished in 2004.
ReplyDelete2. After reading about these three memorials I think that these memorials should have been built because of all the people who died in these incidents, as well as their impact on the American people as well as the rest of the world. I especially think these memorials should have been built to serve as almost like a final resting place for all those who died during these events, the 9/11 tragedy contributing over 3,000, and WWII over 60 million. Just thinking about how many people were affected by those deaths is haunting and definitely deserves memorials.
3. After reading about the other memorials, I believe that there should be something to memorialize WWI in Washington DC. I do not believe that there should be anything large made like a museum, like the 9/11 memorial, or multiple showstopping artworks, but something like a mural along with a plaque showing what happened through the eyes of a collaboration of artists. Like the saying goes, “A picture speaks a thousand words” a mural would be able to capture the feelings and memories that went along with WWI just as well as anything else. An example of what this mural may look like is it showing not only the death and poverty that the war caused, but the good that came out of it in the long run like the beautiful poetry cultural things that were changed and brought out.
4. Personally, I believe that the recent bombing in Boston deserves a memorial, but I do not believe that one should be built. I think that no tragedy that has ever happened should be denied importance, but if we were to build a memorial for each terrible thing happening in the world, it would just take up too much time. If we were to do anything to memorialize the Boston bombing I believe a plaque would suffice. As more memorials begin to be built for various reasons all around the world we should classify them into categories depending on casualties and the effect the event had on the world to determine if anything other than a plaque should be made for the said event.