Atack Adds
1.
- In general i dislike the atack adds. I think that they are pointless just like stupid gossiping that happens goes on at school. It is just an excuse for them to try to get the upperhand and taint the name of there opponents. i think that they are stupid and pointless.
- I think that the adds are harmful because they can bring things out that are a sore subject for the other competitors. I also dont think that they are neccesary to a campaign. A campaign should be won by the ideals of the competitors not the mistakes that they have made that is just a low blow.
- I beleive that they do have a place in todays in todays political race. it is important to know what the other candidates have done howeer it is not neccesary. They become way to common to be ignored when they appear and they are adertised in many different ways. they start to leave an impression on you after awhile.
2.
- The one about Romney and the college plan mad me upset. i disagreed with what he was saying because not all parents can just lend you money for colllege. That can be ridiculusly expensive and not in a familys price range. It mad me sympathize with Obama. The add about Obama made me confused as to the point of the atack add. I didnt know who he was getting compared to and it made sense. what Obama was saying is true so whats the point of using it to atack him he was speaking the truth and honestly about what he thought was needed. it made me question Romneys motives.
- I did accept what was being said in the two ads. Both had evidence that it was being said and details explaning what they meant. I dont question the ads and i shouldnt have to, If someone is paying to put somethign in the eyes of everyone why lye about it and then have reprecussions to deal wth afterwards.
- I would say that between these ads i believe the ads just about the same. Neither of them have done anything to make me question there legitamacy so why should i not believe one but believe the other. If the candidates were making sense then why should i question them
In number 2, I completely agree with the first part about Romney and college funds. Not all parents are financially fit to put their kids through college. In the second part, I agree and disagree. I accept some things, but other things I find questionable. And in the third part, I agree that I believe each one the same. I do not know enough about politics, and this race in particular, to agree with one candidate.
ReplyDeleteI can definitely agree with what you say about the attack ads. Why can't our presidential candidates (or any candidates for that matter) focus on the country's issues, rather than just trying to get into office.
ReplyDelete